Legal Opinion

People v. France

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 2009PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Under CPL 710.60 (1), a defendant is entitled to a hearing on a suppression motion only if there is an issue of fact that must be resolved before it can be determined whether suppression is required. Here, evaluating (1) the face of the pleadings, (2) the context of the motion, and (3) the defendant’s access to information (see People v Mendoza, 82 NY2d 415, 426 [1993]; see also People v Lopez, 5 NY3d 753, 754 [2005]), the motion was properly denied without a hearing. Despite having sufficient information…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. MendozaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. People v. BryantNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 2005

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. GuzmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. People v. PowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. People v. McKinneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. People v. MagnyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  5. People v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API