Legal Opinion
G4s Technology LLC v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 6, 2015No. 2014-5078PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Chief Judge PROST. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.
PROST, Chief Judge.
G4S Technology LLC (“G4S”) appeals from the United States Court of Federal Claims’ grant of summary judgment for the government. The Court of Federal Claims held that G4S is not a third party beneficiary of the government’s contract ■with Open Range Communications, Inc. (“Open Range”), and thus that the government is not liable on G4S’s contract claims. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
This case arises out of a $267 million loan from the Department of Agriculture’s Rural Utilities Service…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- German Alliance Insurance v. Home Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Astra USA, Inc. v. Santa Clara CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Flexfab, L.L.C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- State of Montana v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Glass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- percipient.ai, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
- Global Freight Systems Co. W.L.L. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- People of the State of California Ex Rel. Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General of the State of California v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Air-Sea Systems, LLC v. Grazel Foundation, LLCDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2023
- City of Fresno v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.