Legal Opinion

Ainsworth v. Cooper Underwear Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The examination sought is material and necessary to enable defendant to establish the defense pleaded. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 288.) The defense, if established, is a valid one under section 3 of the Clayton Act (38 U. S. Stat. 731). * We reverse the order vacating the notice of examination. However, we modify that notice by striking out paragraphs numbered 5 and 6. The portion of the order appealed from which denies defendant’s countermotion is reversed, and the motion is granted except that the portion of the new order corresponding with paragraph (1) of defendant’s notice of countermotion…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. General Aniline & Film Corp. v. Bayer Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Remington Rand, Inc. v. International Business Machine Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1937
  3. General Aniline & Film Corp. v. Bayer Co.New York Supreme Court · 1946
  4. 180 Tenants Corp. v. UngarCivil Court of the City of New York · 1963
  5. Jendrasik v. South Buffalo Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API