Grand Canyon Trust v. Public Service Co.
District Court, D. New Mexico
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
BLACK, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs’ second cause of action [Doc. 31]. Having reviewed all the submissions of counsel and the applicable law, the Court finds the motion is well taken and it will be granted.
Standard of Review
Summary judgment is appropriate only “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any materi al fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Franklin v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Simms v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Anderson v. Coors Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Aracely v. NielsenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Amadei v. NielsenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Sierra Club v. Otter Tail Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- AL Otro Lado, Inc. v. NielsenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Sierra Club v. Portland General Electric Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.