Legal Opinion
United States Department of Homeland Security, Customs & Border Protection v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 12, 2011No. 10-1282PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GRIFFITH.
GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), a division of the Department of Homeland Security, changed local work assignments for its inspectors without first negotiating with their union. An arbitrator concluded that this was an unfair labor practice, and the Federal Labor Relations Authority agreed. For the reasons set forth below, we deny CBP’s petition for review.
I
The National Treasury Employees Union represents CBP inspectors nationwide. In 1995, CBP and the Union negotiated a nationwide agreement for how work…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms v. Federal Labor Relations AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Fort Stewart Schools v. Federal Labor Relations AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- BDPCS, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- American Federation of Government Employees v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Department of the Navy, Marine Corps Logistics Base, Albany, Georgia v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio, Intervenor. Marine Corps Logistics Base, Barstow, California v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- American Federation of Government Employees v. FLRACourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
- U.S. Capitol Police v. Office of ComplianceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018