Vs DiCARLO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. v. State
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
FINCH, Chief Justice.
The question presented by this appeal is whether contract rights of a private citizen under a validly executed contract with the State may be asserted and established in a judicial proceeding.
We have jurisdiction because the State of Missouri is a party and more than $30,000 is involved. At the time this appeal was taken, those facts placed jurisdiction of the appeal in this Court. Article V, § 3, Constitution of Missouri, 1945, V. A.M.S. § 477.040, V.A.M.S.
The trial court sustained a motion to dismiss filed by the State. The parties agree that the only ground urged in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Carr v. State ex rel. CoetlosquetIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Ohio Life Insurance & Trust Co. v. DeboltSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. BatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
- University of Maryland v. MaasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Grant Construction Co. v. BurnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Kersten Co., Inc. v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- SJ Groves & Sons Co. v. StateIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Kunzie v. City of OlivetteSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- State Ex Rel. State, Missouri Department of Agriculture v. McHenrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.