Seiler v. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners
Indiana Supreme Court
From DeKalb Circuit Court; E. D. Hartman, Judge. Action by tbe' State on tbe relation of the board of commissioners of DeKalb county against Frank P. Seiler. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court, under §1337o Burns 1901.
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion.
Dowling, J.
I find myself unable to agree with the majority of the court in this case, and, in view of the importance of the issue presented, I will briefly state the reasons forfiny dissent from the prevailing opinion.
Two questions arise upon the record: (1) Did the act of March 1, 1895, (Acts 1895, p. 74) entitle the county auditor to special compensation for his services as a member of the board of review; and (2) if so, did the act of March 11, 1895 (Acts 1895, p. 319) deprive him of it, and require him to pay it into the county treasury ? After a careful examination of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Shea v. City of MuncieIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- State ex rel. Platt v. KirkIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Sudbury v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Board of Commissioners v. GreshamIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Chambers v. State ex rel. BarnardIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.