Legal Opinion

Handigran v. Travis & Natalie, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 7, 2005No. CIV.A. 04-12491-NMGPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

GORTON, District Judge.

In the instant admiralty dispute, plaintiff, Michael B. Handigran (“Handigran”) seeks damages for injuries suffered while aboard the F/V Travis & Natalie, a vessel owned by defendant, Travis & Natalie, Inc. (“Travis”). On February 1, 2005, Travis filed a motion to transfer venue to the District of Rhode Island pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). On May 5, 2005, a scheduling conference was held and the parties briefly addressed the matter orally. Plaintiff requested limited discovery before filing a written opposition and the Court granted him leave to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pure Oil Co. v. SuarezSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Robertson v. M/V CAPE HUNTERDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1997
  3. Biggers v. Borden, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Bishop v. Ashland Oil, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Equipo De Baloncesto Capitanes De Arecibo, Inc. v. Premier Basketball League, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API