Legal Opinion

Biggers v. Borden, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 1979No. Civ. A. 77-2959PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POLLAK, District Judge.

Third party defendant Marine Builders, Inc., has moved to dismiss the third party complaint against it filed by defendant Borden, Inc., on the ground that this court lacks personal jurisdiction over it. Borden opposes the motion. But in the alternative — against the possibility that this Court should conclude that it has no jurisdiction over Marine Builders — Borden has moved to transfer the case to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, where, Borden believes, it can obtain personal jurisdiction over Marine Builders. Plaintiff Steven Biggers…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NY v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Sophie Scheidt and John Scheidt v. Spike Young and Victoria F. Young, Doing Business as Merry Hill LodgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers National Fund v. Baylor Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
  2. Sorrels Steel Co., Inc. v. Great Southwest Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1986
  3. Busch v. Sea World of OhioDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Haeberle v. Texas International AirlinesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Edwards v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API