Legal Opinion
Boikess v. Aspland
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 27, 1969PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
Appellants are faculty members of the State University of New York at Stony Brook, in Suffolk County. They have been subpoenaed and requested to appear before the 1968 Suffolk County Grand Jury, which was impaneled solely for the purpose .of investigating possible drug abuses on the university campus. The District Attorney, acknowledging that appellants are targets of that inquiry, caused the subpoenas to be issued so that he could—according to appellants — proffer the following questions:
1. Have you ever used illegal drugs with students?
2. Have you ever advocated to students the use .of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gardner v. BroderickSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Uniformed Sanitation Men Ass'n v. Commissioner of Sanitation of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Mtr. of Abrams (John Anonymous)New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Cunningham v. NadjariNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Santangello v. PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Matter of Codey (Capital Cities, Abc)New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re Special Investigation No. 244Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.