K-Tel International, Inc. v. Tristar Products, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FRANK, District Judge.
Introduction
The above-entitled matter is before the undersigned United States District Judge pursuant to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue, Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, or Forum Non Conveniens or, in the alternative, to Transfer Venue. In the Complaint, Plaintiff has asserted claims for breach of contract, breach of express warranties, and breach of implied warranties. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion is denied.
Background
Plaintiff K-Tel is a Minnesota corporation with its principal place of business in…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Amini Innovation Corp. v. JS IMPORTS INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2007
- Hammann v. 1-800 Ideas. Com, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2006
- Northbrook Digital, LLC v. Vendio Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Datalink Corp. v. Perkins Eastman Architects, P.C.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Operation: Heroes, Ltd. v. Procter & Gamble Productions, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.