Lambert v. City of Detroit
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBttshnell, J.
I am not in accord with the opinion proposed by the Chief Justice notwithstanding his application of Seifman v. Ford Motor Co., 282 Mich. 342, and Pardeick v. Iron City Engineering Co., 220 Mich. 653. The Chief Justice concludes that the dependents of an employee who died approximately seven and one-half years after sustaining an injury can receive $18 per week for 300' weeks from the date of the injury.
In the Pardeick Case, where death occurred 14 months after the injury, Mr. Justice Fellows, speaking for the court, said:
“We are persuaded that this legislation (referring to part 2, §§ 5, 12,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pardeick v. Iron City Engineering Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
- King v. Munising Paper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Neumeier v. City of MenomineeMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Kaiser v. Little Bros. Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Long v. Isle Royale Copper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wolanin v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Lucas v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Kortz v. Manistee County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Santamour v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943