Rows v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Dissent
Robinson J.,
dissenting. Over objection and exceptions, the state was permitted to introduce at the trial in circuit court the testimony of the defendant taken before the prosecuting attorney. The prosecuting attorney was in a position to argue it to the jury as the sworn testimony of the defendant, although the defendant did not testify at the trial. In my opinion this was testimony taken by the prosecuting attorney in accordance with the statute authorizing the taking of such testimony. Ark. Stat. § 43-801 provides: ‘ ‘ The prosecuting attorneys and their deputies ... shall have authority to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- People v. BermelNew York Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. SteinhardtNew York Supreme Court · 1905
- State v. DuncanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1906
- United States v. BellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1897
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.