Hewlett-Packard Company v. Tel-Design, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TRASK, Circuit Judge:
Hewlett-Packard Company appeals from a judgment of the district court holding U. S. Patent No. 3,290,586, claims 1 through 5, valid and infringed by the manufacture and sale of an Open Cable Pair Locator by the appellant. 1 The district court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a), this being an action arising out of the patent laws of the United States. Our jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
U. S. Patent No. 3,290,586 (hereinafter the “Anderson patent”), known as an “open fault locator” was issued to Robert E. Anderson on December 6, 1966, who in turn assigned…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Deep Welding, Inc. v. Sciaky Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Reeves Instrument Corporation and Dynamics Corporation of America v. Beckman Instruments, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Saf-Gard Products, Inc. v. Service Parts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Louis W. Parker, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Motorola, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Rex Chainbelt Inc., (Cross-Appellee) v. Harco Products, Inc., Dba Dfc Company, (Cross-Appellant)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Famolare, Inc. v. Edison Bros. Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1981
- Kamei-Autokomfort, a Corporation of Germany, and Superior Industries, Inc., a Corporation v. Eurasian Automotive Products (Formerly Gus Mozart)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.