Legal Opinion

Intercoast Trading Co. v. McLaughlin

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 23, 1936No. 19461—RPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROCHE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs sue for a partial refund of a total stamp tax of $27,308.35 paid by the Intercoast Trading Company, a corporation now dissolved, on an original issue of its capital stock. Stock certificates representing the entire issue of 1,800,000 shares without par value were issued from September 10, .1929, to October 22, 1929.

Under Schedule A, subdivision 2, of the Revenue Act of 1926 (section 800 et *150seq. [44 Stat. 99, 101]), as re-enacted by the Revenue Act of 1928 (45 Stat. 791), a stamp tax of one cent was due on every $20 of “actual value” of each stock certificate…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Old Colony Railroad v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. United States v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Wickwire v. ReineckeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. A. Magnano Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. La Societe Francaise De Bienfaisance Mutuelle v. California EmploymentCommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. W. T. Grant Co. v. DugganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  3. Johnson v. RylanderDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API