Legal Opinion

Crary v. Barber

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 15, 1869PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to District Court, Qilpin County.

1Opinion of the CourtHallet, C. J.

The motion to dismiss the writ of error has not been argued, and, perceiving no reason for allowing it, we proceed at once to consider the errors assigned. The plaintiff in error claims that he was not served with process or otherwise legally notified of the pendency of suit in the court below. If this is true, the judgment must be reversed, inasmuch as a court has not authority to render judgment without notice to the party to be charged thereby. Nor can we indulge in a presumption that the plaintiff in error was duly notified of the proceedings against him, or that he appeared in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Malcom v. RogersNew York Supreme Court · 1823
  2. Rany v. GovernorIndiana Supreme Court · 1835
  3. McDonald v. ArnoutIllinois Supreme Court · 1852
  4. Anderson v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1845
  5. Halsey v. HurdU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan · 1853

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. E. W. Agnew & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1896
  2. People Ex Rel. School District No. 6 v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  3. Spitzhak v. RegenikSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API