Legal Opinion

In Re Hourani

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided May 31, 2000No. 14-00-00325-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice.

In this mandamus proceeding, we interpret and apply section 74.053 of the Texas Government Code, which governs a litigant’s right to object to assigned judges, commonly referred to as “visiting judges.” At issue is whether litigants who become parties after a visiting judge begins to preside in the case have a right to object under this statutory provision. 1

I.Factual and PROCEDURAL OVERVIEW

In April 1999, Value Recovery Group (“VRG”) filed suit against Monzer Hourani and numerous other parties. VRG named the relators, Elie Hourani and Diana El-mas, as…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Ltd. v. Williamson County Appraisal DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Surgitek, Bristol-Myers Corp. v. AbelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Mitchell Energy Corp. v. AshworthTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Brady v. Fourteenth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. U. Lawrence Boze' & Associates, P.C. and U. Lawrence Boze' v. Harris County Appraisal District, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  2. Thomas v. Healthmark Partners, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  3. City of Houston v. Hotels.com, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  4. Value Recovery Group, Inc. v. HouraniDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2000
  5. Christopher Brown and Carrie Brown v. Enterprise Recovery Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API