Legal Opinion

Kirkland v. Wright

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 15, 1969No. 5-5069PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lyle Brown, Justice.

On petition of James G. Wright the chancellor forgave accrued support money payments previously ordered for the minor children of the parties and suspended future reduced payments. That action was taken because the mother (the custodial parent) left the State, leaving their young boy with the father and taking the baby girl with her. The chancellor reasoned that the boy had been left behind to be supported by the father and that the girl’s removal from the jurisdiction of the court defeated the father’s visitation rights. On .appeal Margaret Wright (Kirkland) contends that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brun v. RembertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  2. Riegler v. RieglerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  3. Sage v. SageSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  4. Pence v. PenceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  5. Carnahan v. CarnahanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bethell v. BethellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Holley v. HolleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Sharum v. DodsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  4. Lee v. LeeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Henson v. MoneyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API