Dunn v. E. E. Gray Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRtjgg, C.J.
This is an action for malicious prosecution. It is alleged in the declaration as amended that the defendant maliciously and without probable cause had the. plaintiff arrested on a complaint for larceny made in the Municipal Court of the City of Boston, and “did falsely, fraudulently, maliciously and by perjury and subornation of perjury, and without any probable cause, prosecute and aid in prosecuting said complaint against the plaintiff, until the twenty-fourth day of January, 1924, when the plaintiff was found guilty. And the defendant, its servants and agents continued in the prosecution…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Boston v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Lewis v. CorbinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Cosmopolitan Trust Co. v. S. L. Agoos Tanning Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Nye v. StorerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Dennehey v. WoodsumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- James Earle v. Robert BenoitCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Emery v. EmeryMontana Supreme Court · 1948
- Graham v. Buffalo General Laundries Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Broussard v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Enbinder v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.