Bronesky v. Estech, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Sognier, Judge.
James Bronesky sued Estech, Inc. to recover for personal injuries received in a fall on Estech’s premises. The trial court granted Es-tech’s motion for summary judgment and Bronesky appeals.
1. Appellant contends that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment in favor of Estech based upon its determination that Bronesky was a mere licensee at the time he was injured. The evidence, construed most favorably to appellant as the party opposing the motion for summary judgment, Atkins v. Tri-Cities Steel, 166 Ga. App. 349, 351 (304 SE2d 409) (1983), discloses the following…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Coffer v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Crosby v. Savannah Electric & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Augusta Amusements, Inc. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Peacock Construction Co. v. ChambersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
- Smith v. Jewell Cotton Mill Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Paul v. SharpeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Evans v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Rice v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Simone v. Hancock Textile Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Shaw v. McDonald's Restaurants of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.