Legal Opinion

Daniels v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 25, 2001No. 00-6298Published

1Opinion of the Court

254 F.3d 1180 (10th Cir. 2001)

STEVE ALAN DANIELS, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 00-6298

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT

June 25, 2001

ON APPLICATION FOR AUTHORIZATION TO FILE SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE HABEAS MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2255 (W. Dist. Okla.)[Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Howard A. Pincus, Assistant Federal Public Defender (Michael G. Katz, Federal Public Defender, and Vicki Mandell-King, Assistant Federal Public Defender, with him on the briefs), Denver, Colorado, for…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API