Legal Opinion

National Football League Players Ass'n v. National Football League

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided May 22, 2009No. Civil 08-6254 (PAM/JJG), 08-6255 (PAM/JJG)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PAUL A. MAGNUSON, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on cross-Motions for Summary Judgment filed by all parties in these related cases.

BACKGROUND

In July and August 2008, players in the National Football League (“NFL”) submitted to random testing for steroids and other substances in accordance with the NFL’s Policy on Anabolic Steroids and Related Substances (the “Policy”). (Greenspan Decl. Ex. 1 (hereinafter “Policy”) at 4 (“Each week during the preseason and regular season, ten (10) players on every team will be tested.”).) The Policy’s testing regimen is…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API