Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Bolton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 27, 2002No. 01-827PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert L. Brown, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of child support. The issue is whether a railroad employee, appellant Gary Montgomery, may deduct Tier II' railroad-retirement withholdings from gross income under Arkansas Supreme Court Administrative Order Number 10 for the purpose of determining child support. The trial court concluded that he could not. Montgomery appeals on the basis that the trial court erred in denying the Tier II deduction. We agree, and we reverse and remand.

On December 28, 1993, Montgomery and appellee Jade Bolton, formerly Montgomery, divorced. Custody of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Faulkner v. Arkansas Children's HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Burcham v. City of Van BurenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Stephens v. Arkansas School for the BlindSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. City of Lowell v. M & N Mobile Home Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gwin v. DanielsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Arkansas Gas Consumers, Inc. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Lewellen v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Stilley v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Walker v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API