Legal Opinion

Anesh Gupta v. Richard T. McGahey

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 15, 2013No. 11-14240PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Per curiam

Anesh Gupta appeals the district court’s dismissal of his Bivens action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Gupta’s Complaint alleges that three U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents violated his Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights when they arrested and detained him in connection with the initiation of removal proceedings against him. The district court concluded that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to hear Gupta’s claims under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g) because all of his claims arise from the agents’ decision or action to commence removal proceedings. We affirm.

I. FACTS AND…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Carmichael v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. Al-ArianCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Santiago Alvarez v. U.S. Immigration and Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  2. Keila Rosa Camarena v. Director, Immigration and Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
  3. Mr. Julien Michel Belleri v. USACourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
  4. Jesus Lopez Silva v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  5. Frank L. Amodeo v. FCC Coleman - Low WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API