Legal Opinion
Toyota of Visalia, Inc. v. New Motor Vehicle Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 14, 1987No. F006297PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN (G.A.), P. J.
On petition of Toyota of Visalia, Inc. (Toyota) 1 for a. writ of administrative mandamus pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 2 section 1094.5, the superior court admitted certain exhibits in evidence and issued its writ directing the New Motor Vehicle Board (Board) to consider the newly admitted evidence in determining the appropriate sanctions and penalties to be assessed against Toyota for certain established violations of the Vehicle Code. The issues relate to the propriety of the superior court’s admitting the evidence and the scope of the direction to the Board…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- City of Fairfield v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Magit v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Borror v. Department of InvestmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Brown v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Voices of the Wetlands v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Nightlife Partners, Ltd. v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Fort Mojave Indian Tribe v. California Department of Health ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Pomona Valley Hosp. Med. Ctr. v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Evans v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.