Legal Opinion

Mayes v. Watt

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 4, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CULLEN, Commissioner.

Helen Mayes and her husband, Robert, appeal from a judgment awarding Robert M. Watt, Jr., $50,000 damages for malicious prosecution.

Various grounds of error are asserted but we find it necessary to consider only the ground that the defense of advice of counsel was established as a matter of law and the trial court therefore erred in overruling the appellants’ motions for a directed verdict and for judgment n. o. v.

The claim of malicious prosecution arose out of the appellants’ having caused to be issued a warrant charging the appellee with a violation of KRS 435.240(3),…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moser v. FableCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Stanhope v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Flynn v. SongerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  2. Worley v. Columbia Gas of Kentucky, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  3. Emmett C. Worley v. Columbia Gas of Kentucky, Inc., Kentucky Gas Transmission Corporation, Emmett C. Worley, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. Columbia Gas of Kentucky, Inc., Defendants-Cross-Appellees. Emmett C. Worley v. Mutual Pipeline Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API