Legal Opinion

Worley v. Columbia Gas of Kentucky, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 27, 1973No. Nos. 73-1204, 73-1205, 73-1207PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEICK, Circuit Judge.

Mutual Pipeline Contractors, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Mutual), John T. Dix and Chester Nowicke (Mutual’s principal officers), Columbia Gas of Kentucky, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Columbia Gas), and Kentucky Gas Transmission Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Kentucky Gas Transmission), have appealed from a judgment entered in the District Court against them in favor of the plaintiff Worley, in the amount of $800,000, on a complaint charging the defendants with conspiring to maliciously prosecute plaintiff Worley for the offense of issuing checks drawn…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McClarty v. BickelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  2. Schott v. Indiana National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Davis v. BradyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. Reid v. TrueCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
  5. Simpson v. AntrobusCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kirk v. MarcumCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1986
  2. Stewart v. Shelby Tissue, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1999
  3. Emmett C. Worley v. Columbia Gas of Kentucky, Inc., Kentucky Gas Transmission Corporation, Emmett C. Worley, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. Columbia Gas of Kentucky, Inc., Defendants-Cross-Appellees. Emmett C. Worley v. Mutual Pipeline Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  4. Farris v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API