Legal Opinion
Muller Optical Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided November 10, 1983No. 83-2836 HPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
HORTON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Muller Optical Company and its president, Robert E. Long, seek a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction prohibiting the defendant, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), from requiring Long to appear at a deposition and produce documents in compliance with a subpoena issued by the EEOC. The Court held a hearing on this matter, and, after a full review of the record and careful consideration of the issues involved, enters this Order DENYING plaintiffs’ motion.
This action is the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. DykeTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1984
- People of State of NY v. Holiday Inns, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1984
- Lopez v. Bulova Watch Co., Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1984
- Wagoner v. Central Platte Natural Resources DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Pan American World AirwaysDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.