Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re White

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 4, 1983No. 103 and 104Published

1DissentMontemuro, Judge

I must respectfully dissent.

We are confronted here with two questions: 1) whether Raymond White should have been removed as a co-trustee, and; 2) whether appellee bank’s petition to resign as co-trustee should have been granted. The majority holds that the trial court, in permitting both of the above, abused its discretion. On the basis of the record before us, and keeping ever mindful of our scope of review, I have concluded that the decision of the court below should be affirmed.

Before addressing either of the issues stated above, I should first reiterate, as a preliminary matter, our scope…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Crawford's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Berm Studios, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. In Re Estate of CroessantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Corr EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. DiMarco EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API