People v. Smith
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to the recorder’s court of Detroit. ' (Chambers, J.) Respondent was convicted of the crime of burglary,, and sentenced to imprisonment in the Detroit House of Correction for five years. The facts are stated in the opinion in People v. Shaughnessy, 89 Mich. 130.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
The respondent was informed against in the same information with Michael Shaughnessy and Edward Bailey. He was tried in the recorder’s court of the city of Detroit before a jury, convicted, and sentenced to the Detroit House of Correction for the term of five years. The facts are so fully set forth in People v. Shaughnessy, 89 Mich. 130, that it is unnecessary to state them here. The respondent contends:
1. That there was no evidence in the present case showing that the breaking into the store was in the nighttime, and with intent to commit a felony.
*112. That the testimony shows that the store…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. GraneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. ShaughnessyMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. BrottMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- State v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- People v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- People v. OstranderMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. HeardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.