Legal Opinion

Lieberman v. Schoenlank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 1, 1935No. Gen. No. 37,920Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely

Arma Schiffman, by leave of court, filed her intervening petition in a foreclosure proceeding objecting to the entry of the decree of sale; her objections were overruled and the decree entered. She appeals.

A bill was filed to foreclose a second mortgage, and subsequently a bill was filed to foreclose a first mortgage on the same premises; the causes were consolidated and proceeded to decree; petitioner is the owner of a bond secured by the first mortgage.

One of the bills made party defendant “Foreman Trust & Savings Bank, as Trustee, under Trust No. 4200.” Petitioner argues that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hale v. HaleIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Straus v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1933
  3. Dubs v. EgliIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Odell v. LevyIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Firebaugh v. SeegrenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API