Legal Opinion

Firebaugh v. Seegren

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 29, 1932No. Gen. No. 35,419PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matchett

By this writ of error defendants, in a proceeding brought by the trustee to foreclose a trust deed, seek to reverse a decree in favor of complainant entered on July 18, 1931. The cause was heard by the chancellor upon exceptions to the report of the master. The report recommended a decree of foreclosure as prayed in the bill and the findings of the master were confirmed by the chancellor. The decree found the total unpaid indebtedness secured by the trust deed to be $71,522.37 and directed the sale of the premises in case of a further default in payment.

The original indebtedness was $67,500…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Olds v. CummingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Chicago & Great Western Railroad Land Co. v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Clemens v. CraneIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Lake Street Elevated RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. KranszIllinois Supreme Court · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Andrews v. CramerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. Saskill v. 4-B ACCEPTANCEAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Marks v. PopeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  4. Firebaugh v. SeegrenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1933
  5. Angevine v. City of SesserDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API