Legal Opinion
United States v. William M. Abroms
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 18, 1991No. 90-5644PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:
William M. Abroms challenges his perjury conviction, primarily contending that the evidence was insufficient and that his testi mony before the grand jury, on which he was convicted, was not material to its investigation. We AFFIRM.
I
In the spring of 1988, Danny Gonzalez and Leo Ladouceur, San Antonio, Texas, businessmen, purchased a large share of the stock in Suburban Savings Association (Suburban), a San Antonio savings and loan. Because the purchase gave Gonzalez and Ladouceur control of Suburban, they were required by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB) to…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Brad Eugene Branch, Kevin Whitecliff, Jaime Castillo, Renos Lenny Avraam, Paul Fatta and Graeme Leonard CraddockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Michael E. GaudinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. PettigrewCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Roy Lee PierceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Garrett A. Tansley, A/K/A Jerry Tansley and Douglas Raymond Cox, A/K/A Doug KellyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.