Legal Opinion

Cooley v. Ben Paris Sporting Goods & Recreation Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1940No. 27933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought for the purpose of recovering the balance claimed to be due upon a con tract for the construction of a ski lift. One of the defendants was the Ben Paris Sporting Goods & Recreation Company, Inc. There were a number of other defendants, all of whom were dismissed out of the case. The cause was tried to a jury and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $2,107.14. The defendant moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and, in the alternative, for a new trial, both of which motions were overruled. Judgment was entered upon the verdict, from which the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tingley v. Fairhaven Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. City of Garden City v. HellerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  3. Stofferan v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Brotton v. LangertWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Allman Hubble Tugboat Co. v. Reliance Development Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ventoza v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  2. Benjamin v. Havens, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API