Legal Opinion
Morris Struhl, Inc. v. Relaxor Cushion Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 21, 1958PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUGARMAN, District Judge.
On March 5, 1958 the plaintiff Morris Struhl, Inc. filed its complaint against the defendant Relaxor Cushion Corporation. Both the plaintiff and defendant are New York corporations with their principal places of business in New York City.
The complaint bases jurisdiction “on the Trade-Mark Act of 1946 known as the Lanham Act, and particularly on 15 U.S. C. § 1121 and 1125(a).”
It charges that the plaintiff, for many years a manufacturer of health and beauty aids, which are sold under its registered trademark “Chic” has established a reputation for the reliability and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- L'Aiglon Apparel, Inc. v. Lana Lobell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Chas. D. Briddell, Inc. v. Alglobe Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Judson Dunaway Corporation v. Hygienic Products Co. Hygienic Products Co. v. Judson Dunaway CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949
- Yonkers Raceway, Inc. v. Standardbred Owners Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Mastercrafters Clock & Radio Co. v. Vacheron & Constantin-Le Coultre WatchesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
3Cited by6 opinions
- General Pool Corporation v. Hallmark Pool CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1966
- American Rolex Watch Corp. v. Jack Laufer & Jan Voort, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1959
- Bogene Inc. v. Whit-Mor Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Car-Freshner Corporation v. Turtle Wax, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Cascade Pools Corp. v. Consolidated Pools & Equipment Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.