Legal Opinion

Loeb v. Loeb

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 6, 1966PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

91 N.J. Super. 333 (1966)

220 A.2d 209

CLARA LOEB, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

WILLIAM A. LOEB, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 23, 1966.

Decided June 6, 1966.

Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEONARD.

Mr. Benjamin D. Braelow argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Nathan A. Whitfield argued the cause for respondent.

2Per curiam

We agree with the determinations embodied in the order under appeal with one exception. We are not in accord with the holding in the Chancery Division that a plaintiff who has obtained a judgment nisi of divorce may not at will abrogate that…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Iovino v. IovinoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  2. Ferrari v. FerrariNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  3. Loeb v. LoebNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roberts, Walsh & Co. v. TrugmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  2. Parker v. ParkerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  3. Loeb v. LoebSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  4. McLean v. GrabowskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API