Legal Opinion

In re Keil

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided February 29, 1936No. 28212PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INCH, District Judge.

The bankrupt seeks to review an order of the referee. The Prudential Insurance Company of America likewise petitions for a review of said order.

The question involved is important although it arises here over a small amount, of money.

The bankrupt, prior to his voluntary bankruptcy, was insured in certain insurance companies. He paid the premiums out of his earnings, and there is no claim made or indicated that these premiums were excessive or that the bankrupt insured himself or paid the premiums with intent to defraud his creditors.

The details are sufficiently set forth…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Surace v. DannaNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. In Re MessingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  3. Chatham Phenix National Bank v. CrosneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Crossman Co. v. RauchNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. Wilson v. McLaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re RogersDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1942
  2. In re RagozzinoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1941
  3. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance v. KlawNew York Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API