Legal Opinion

Ferrell v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlaeKsoN, J.

At tbe close of plaintiff’s evidence, tbe defendant did not make a motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. Tbe record discloses “at tbe conclusion of all tbe testimony tbe Court, of its own volition, ordered that judgment of nonsuit be entered.”

In Nowell v. Basnight, 185 N. C., 142 (147), “The following may be considered as fairly interpretative of C. S., 567 . . . Time of making motion — It must be made first at the close of plaintiff’s evidence and before defendant introduces any evidence.” By the failure of defendant to follow strictly 0. S., 567, the question of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nowell v. BasnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Nobles v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Newbern v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Harrison v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Hood, Comr. of Banks v. . BaylessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nunn v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Robinson v. . McAlhaneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Jenkins v. FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Cauley v. General American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Williamson v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API