Legal Opinion

In re the alleged lunacy of Lindsley

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On petition to set aside inquisition, and for leave to traverse.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The first commission in the nature of a writ de lunático mquirendo was issued in this matter in 1885, and returned in July of that year, the return being, that at the time of taking the inquisition Mrs. Lindsley was of unsound mind, and totally incapable of transacting her own business affairs; that she did not enjoy lucid intervals, and that she had been in the same state of lunacy for three years and upwards. Afterwards, upon the petition of Mrs. Lindsley, the inquisition thus returned was set aside, because the chancellor was in doubt, in point of fact, as to the correctness…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Federal Trust Co. v. ConklinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1916
  2. Fourteenth Ward Building & Loan Ass'n v. PotterNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Springdale Park, Inc. v. AndriotisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  2. In Re RiesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API