Legal Opinion

State v. Carter

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 10, 2013No. SC 93333PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARY R. RUSSELL, Chief Justice.

Stanley Carter appeals his convictions for first-degree assault and armed criminal action. He alleges that the trial court erred in overruling his Batson1 challenges to three of the prosecutor’s peremptory strikes, and failed to sua sponte admonish the prosecutor or declare a mistrial for alleged prejudicial statements he made during closing arguments. After an opinion by the Court of Appeals, this Court granted transfer pursuant to Mo. Const, art. V, § 10.

This Court holds that Carter did not meet his burden in demonstrating that the prosecutor’s strikes…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  4. State v. SilveySupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  5. State v. TisiusSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State of Missouri v. Chadwick Leland WalterSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  2. Shelby E. Watson v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  3. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. CHRISTA ELAINE MUELLERMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. State v. SteidleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State of Missouri v. Roscoe R. MeeksSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API