Legal Opinion

Deterling v. Geib

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 15, 1934No. 29,738PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JULIUS J. OLSON, Justice.

Appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial after instructed verdict for defendants.

Plaintiff brought this action against defendants to recover damages upon the theory that they Avere his agents in purchasing certain wheat options. He claims that the defendants “falsely and fraudulently represented to the plaintiff herein that the price of said wheat was then and there the sum of $1.30 per bushel, A\diereas, in fact, the price of wheat Avas then and there the sum of $1.84% per bushel and defendants further falsely and fraudulently represented to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mohr v. MiesenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. Fraser v. Farmers Co-Operative Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Askegaard v. DalenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  4. Bolfing v. SchoenerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. Johnstown Land Co. v. Brainerd Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Thomes v. AtkinsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1943
  3. Downey v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API