Legal Opinion

Zipwall, LLC v. Fastcap, LLC

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 9, 2007No. Civil Action 05-11852-JLTPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

TAURO, District Judge.

This case arises out of Plaintiff Zipwall, LLC’s claim that Defendant Fastcap, LLC, is infringing three patents Plaintiff holds on its dust barrier technology. Defendant moves for summary judgment of non-infringement and invalidity. Plaintiff has cross-filed for summary judgment of liability.

Background

I. Parties

Plaintiff Zipwall, LLC, a Connecticut company, supplies dust barrier systems for interior construction. Plaintiffs patents claim various products, methods, and systems related to erecting dust barriers using poles, clips, and plastic sheets. The poles…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  5. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API