Legal Opinion

Berte v. Luse

California Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 12241PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This appeal is taken from a judgment quieting title in favor of plaintiff. The complaint is in the form usually employed in such an action. The defendant Clara H. Bergmeier admitted that title and possession of the property was in plaintiff, but alleged that she and her trustees, A. F. Luse and Western States Land and Mortgage Company, claim an interest in the property by virtue of a deed from plaintiff to this defendant, which deed was intended as security for a $10,000 loan alleged to have been made by this defendant to plaintiff. Defendants A. F. Luse, Mary E. Luse and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strange v. StrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  2. Denning v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Tannahill v. GreeningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Thiele v. Security Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Willard George Hotel Co. v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shelley v. HurwitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API