Legal Opinion

UTTER v. IRVIN

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 15, 1942No. 10360PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

Submitted on an agreed statement of facts, this is another of those difficult cases in which the question to be determined is whether, though the parties to an agreement did not so intend, the terms of the agreement did not make them partners. It arises on the voluntary petition of two of the parties to the agreement admitting their bankruptcy and seeking to have themselves and the other parties to the agreement adjudicated a bankrupt partnership. The referee thought the agreement constituted a partnership, and, in an opinion set out in the record, gave his reasons…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fink v. BrownTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  2. Ogus, Rabinovich & Ogus Co. v. Foley Bros. Dry Goods Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Fahey v. SapioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1929
  4. Williams v. WolffCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924
  5. Eddingston v. AcomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re HareDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1962
  2. Crabb v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
  3. D. H. Pritchard, Contractor, Inc. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
  4. Schroder v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
  5. In re Pauline's Fashion SalonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API