Schroder v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
This is another of those efforts to make future returns from personal services taxable to some one other than the real earner of them. Cf. Saenger v. Commissioner, 5 Cir., 69 F.2d 631; Walter P. Villere v. Commissioner, 5 Cir., 133 F.2d 905. Like that in Mead v. Commissioner, 10 Cir., 131 F.2d 323, it takes the form of a marital partnership. The Board, in an unreported opinion, determined as a fact, that, though petitioner and his wife went through the form of entering into a business partnership, they did not, in fact, intend, they did not, in fact, create, one. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Griffiths v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Saenger v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Scherf v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
- Argo v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
- Hardymon v. GlennDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1944
- Paxson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Sewell's Estate v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.