Frederick Emanuel Scurlock v. State of Mississippi

IRVING, P.J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. This appeal arises from the Panola County Circuit Court’s denial of Frederick Emanuel Scurlock’s motion for post-conviction relief (PCR). On appeal, Scurlock argues that (1) the State failed to intror duce testimony from the witness who certified the documents used to prove his prior convictions; (2) the circuit court erroneously imposed a habitual-offender enhancement, and (3) the State failed to provide evidence of the alleged victim’s age.

¶ 2. Because we agree with the circuit court’s judgment denying Scurlock’s PCR motion, we affirm.

FACTS

¶ 3. On March 1,…