State v. Munsey
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Justice.
This case brings to the Court questions as to the admissibility of two separate statements made by the defendant to law enforcement officers. On 11 June 1993, after the defendant had been arrested and warned of his rights pursuant to Miranda, he told the officers he would like to have a lawyer. When a person under arrest tells a law enforcement officer that he wants to have an attorney, any interrogation must stop, and the officers cannot again interrogate that person without an attorney being present unless the person under arrest initiates further dialogue with the officers.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. RiddickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. PenleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- State v. BartlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
- State v. NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. ParisiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
- State v. BellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.