State v. Bartlett
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Chief Justice.
When the superior court conducts a pretrial hearing on a motion to suppress pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 15A-977, only the judge who presides at the hearing may make findings of fact concerning the evidence presented. When findings of fact are necessary to resolve a material conflict in the evidence and the judge who presides at the hearing does not make them, a new suppression hearing is required. In this case, a material conflict in the evidence arose from a disagreement between two expert witnesses, and a judge who did not hear the testimony of either expert resolved that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. LaddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. ParisiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
- State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.