Legal Opinion

State v. Bartlett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 25, 2015No. 19PA14PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

When the superior court conducts a pretrial hearing on a motion to suppress pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 15A-977, only the judge who presides at the hearing may make findings of fact concerning the evidence presented. When findings of fact are necessary to resolve a material conflict in the evidence and the judge who presides at the hearing does not make them, a new suppression hearing is required. In this case, a material conflict in the evidence arose from a disagreement between two expert witnesses, and a judge who did not hear the testimony of either expert resolved that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. LaddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  2. State v. NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  3. State v. ParisiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
  4. State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  5. State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API