Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Foster

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 4, 1969No. 2179PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

The record in this disciplinary proceeding against respondent, Haman M. Foster, shows that on December 6, 1965, respondent accepted professional employment to file suit for his client to recover judgment on a note in the sum of $1,334.29. On December 6, 1965, he was instructed to “start action quickly”. Some preliminary effort was made to collect the note without suit. It also appears from the record that during the period from December 6, 1965, to May 15, 1967, client wrote respondent six or seven times and contacted him in his office and by phone urging him to file the suit.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Disbarment of ConnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. In Re Van SpanckerenArizona Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BraswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. ColstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DowningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MinterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API