Legal Opinion

Miller v. EQUIFAX, INC.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 13, 2009No. 022393, A135954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant Consolidated Credit Services, Inc. (“Consolidated”). Concluding that it lacked jurisdiction because the case had been removed to federal court and never remanded, the trial court entered a judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ claims. We affirm.

The pertinent facts are, for the most part, procedural. In October 2002, plaintiffs filed a complaint in Columbia County Circuit Court against defendant Equifax, Inc., alleging claims under federal and state debt collection practices statutes and for libel and slander. The case number assigned was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. City of San JoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Kowalski v. Hereford L'OasisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Allstate Insurance v. PrestonDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lynn, K. v. Aria Health SystemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. Lynn, K. v. Aria Health SystemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Carlos Fernando Reixach Murey, as administrator of the Estate of Carlos Lens Fernandez v. City of Chickasaw, Michael E. Reynolds, Cynthia Robinson Burt, Arellia Taylor, and George TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API